In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 12 Jun 2003 07:42:46 -0700, Michael Sierchio
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
kudzu> Fiel Cabral wrote:
kudzu>
kudzu> > But if the certificate is a sub CA certificate, then is
kudzu> > there a way to find out? Are X.509 v1 or v2 sub CA
kudzu> > certificates common?
kudzu>
kudzu> V2? Fickt nicht mit der raeketenmensch! Perhapssss you mean
kudzu> to say V1 or V3?
v2 exists, but has seldom been used in real life...
kudzu> If the cert is a sub-CA cert then it is not self-signed.
kudzu> Unless there is some quantum subtlety that I am missing
kudzu> here.
I don't think that was a question either.
The answer is that no, there is no way to distiguish sub-CA
certificates from user certificates (i.e. v1 and v2 user certificates
can be used as sub-CA certificates).
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsv�gen 3 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
