> >yeah, that's what misled me before.
> got it. :)
>
> >Are you worried about data corruption such that an a non-signed hash is
> >actually buying you anything?
> I m sorry Rich, I m not sure if I understand your question. Can
> you please
> explain.
I think what he's trying to get at is whether you're trying to protect
against accidential data corruption or malicious data corruption.
DS
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
