I think there is a reason why you cant encrypt a message without 1st signing it using smime

By your logic, any preshared "key" would do the trick , why bother with the cert ?
(in other words, hiscert or mycert, if all you are doing is using it as a key to some encoder, why bother with certs)??



El hallabi-Kettani Abderrahmane wrote:

--- Alok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :

But when you sing with your public key, and encrypt
with your public key,
how will he decrypt it if he does not have your
private key?



you sign with the private key existed in mycert.pem or
in a separate file priv_key.pem , after you use this private key, to decrypt first the session key used in
the aes256 algorithm , then you can decrypt the data
with this session key.


Abdou,





Vous manquez d'espace pour stocker vos mails ? Yahoo! Mail vous offre GRATUITEMENT 100 Mo !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.benefits.yahoo.com/


Le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger est arrivé ! Découvrez toutes les nouveautés pour 
dialoguer instantanément avec vos amis. A télécharger gratuitement sur 
http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]






______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to