> > X509_4thEditionDraftV7.pdf (I'm reading my copy right now) still has > Time defined as a choice of UTCTime and GeneralizedTime, and (on page > 23), version is still to be set to v2 (1) or v3 (2). So that doesn't > seem to have anything to do with the alleged X.509 v4... > > And considering the discussions I mentioned were so long ago, and > nothing seems to have been said since, I'm assuming the v4 idea was > dropped, at least for now.
As far as I understand "X509_4thEdition", it is the 4 in that word that is meant. Since the invention of extensions there is not really a need to change the format of certs or crls, or ... ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
