> The security work in SNMPv3 is old and outdated and years > behind current practice. Some of that is understandable, but > but even back then we knew enough to know that raw UDP is > almost architecturally flawed.
Not quite on the list topic - but if you were aware of the constraints placed on SNMP protocol and its security model, you probably wouldn't be so rash in judgement. P.S. I'm sure Marshall Rose would love to hear your arguments against UDP. :-) And so would DTLS crowd. :-) ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
