Thanks Chris, I appreciate you taking time to respond & help.

Parind. 


 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 8:35 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries

On 5/12/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That works Chris.
>
> Obviously I'm missing a step, can you please tell me what did you do 
> to build the static version of 64 bit binaries? I want to be able to 
> build them and not keep bothering you.
>
> Thanks again,
> Parind.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 1:16 AM
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
>
> On 5/12/06, hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/11/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Chris,
> > >
> > > I was able to use binaries you provided & also create my own set 
> > > this time. Here's the output of the test.bat. Looks like it passed
> all tests.
> > > I ran in on 64 bit Win 2003 Server R2.
> > >
> > > One thing I'm still struggling with is that I can't build the 
> > > static
>
> > > libs for the 64 bit, can you?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Parind.
> > >
> >
> > I will give it a try...
> >
> > Chris.
> >
> Give these a try...
>
> Openssl-0.9.8b-static-libs-Win64-ia64.zip
> Openssl-0.9.8b-static-libs-Win64-x64.zip
>
> Chris.
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Parind,

You do everything the same ... according to the instructions. But when
you run ma\ntdll.mak you make dynamic DLL's. If you do ms\nt.mak instead
you will get static libs.

It doesn't say this in the 64 bit instructions but I know this from
building the 32 bit code. It works with the 64 bit compile as well.

I hope this helps... let me know how you make out.

Chris.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to