-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 ... and was this version number in 0.9.7g not user or optional?
It's a bit astonishing that it worked with an older but not with the current version! What standard is used to describe the private key in this method (sorry, I looked for it, but I didn't find it)? Thank you! Thomas - -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Nils Larsch Gesendet: Samstag, 24. März 2007 00:27 An: openssl-users@openssl.org Betreff: Re: Import private key with d2i_AutoPrivateKey Hellstern, Thomas (LfSt) wrote: ... > [exec] d2i_AutoPrivateKey returned a key at 0x00000000 > [exec] ERR_get_error()=218783872 (0x0d0a6080) > [exec] ERR_lib_error_string(rc)=asn1 encoding routines > [exec] ERR_func_error_string(rc)=LONG_C2I > [exec] ERR_reason_error_string(rc)=integer too large for long well, your key is broken. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp> dumpasn1 key.bin 0 1184: SEQUENCE { 4 257: INTEGER : 00 9F 6D 64 3B 61 63 B5 D4 41 AF 5E CE BA 33 DF : 18 08 0F FB E5 A1 CA FE FA 31 29 3B BE 6A 2E 95 : 4E A7 53 97 CD C9 1E C8 B7 36 6E B5 7B 83 83 E7 ... the version number of the structure is missing (as openssl tries to store the version number in a 'long' openssl attempts to store the first entry, here the modulus, in a long ... see above error message). Nils ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 9.5.3 (Build 5003) wsBVAwUBRgy82qTlPALTHpGCAQiJPggAn/bYjIc/ri0rnGCJjbpf5QsgW35ga+Qd yBthcsvs5XrL3GQ61fNG0eIPrWKzswvJrnB3IOPS1vnFiHQJF513cuoIxm1NCSOy 6fk/GzSZJIWY4BXiP04HIlWmI9xuv9PwvD8laxPRkhTSMpxFUuuLBQFZX3IbPdJh py8zoStt+nOk2n9PMzN6BbGFg2mRKPLNBlJ1Vc7cILu1GoIfUJXPdmDnlVt9OjZa MfwgHsrcfBd6PHyEVSn49NpL+VUuveD1jD75e/M7VhMxYlWPcx0hIPL7nb4oXTle VlqY7Rbo/BJsn2vHtKGXfCwSyf2Z4RmrpgQcwyihDKRJevKcs0mdvA== =rqoi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
