> So what you are saying is the scenario we have been discussing so far is > possible ONLY in case of memory allocation issues NOT OTHERWISE. > I guess I will have a look at the SSL_connect code before I just > trust this > :-)
I would still recommend coding to handle this case. Perhaps the next version of OpenSSL will include a check in SSL_connect that this version does not have. It's not a good idea to build undocumented insider information about a library into code that calls into that library. You should do that only when there is a very good reason. DS ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]