On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 15:33 -0400, Leonard F. Elia wrote:
> In fact, it is probably bigger
> than Y2K because it will involve changes to most flavors of the Unix
> operating system. It is neither trivially solved, nor an unknown
> problem.
>
I understand the issue, and like I said I was hoping to be retired
before it was an issue.
If we are just going to live with the limitation shouldn't there at
least be a check for the overflow and if so then send a message about
illegal date and not generate the certificate rather then generating a
certificate with a notAfter date prior to the notBefore date ?
Thanks
Chris Kottaridis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [email protected]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
