-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kenneth Goldman wrote: | > The decision in the case of OpenSSL was that 1.x would have a stable API, | > permitting shared libraries to be used interchangeably. OpenSSL does not | > have a stable API yet, officially. | | If that's the rationale, I eagerly await 1.0.
Be prepared to wait a long time... I don't think we see a OpenSSL 1.0 anytime soon. If you think that a 0.9.9 indicates a pending 1.0, you are wrong. The OpenSSL version numbering allows something like a version 0.255.255 ... So I expect that the release after 0.9.9 will be a 0.9.10... Goetz - -- DMCA: The greed of the few outweighs the freedom of the many -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIsYd92iGqZUF3qPYRAmFNAJ0d5F8fOB1ihoRg37VDc7uNIhSC3wCfe/Z8 qFcrCJO2nkk8NCl2Z1osryk= =FoPM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
