Hello Mounir:

Agreed: your version appears cleaner and more to the point.
The EVP_* interfaces are not so easy to understand, but maybe
this is just me :-)

Thanks again for helping
-- Chev

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Mounir IDRASSI <mounir.idra...@idrix.net> wrote:
> As far as I know, it's only supported in the 0.9.9 development tree through
> the introduction of the new type EVP_PKEY_CTX and the new functions
> EVP_PKEY_sign_init and EVP_PKEY_sign. Personally, I find it simpler to
> implement this scheme using the low level primitives I showed you in my
> sample code.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to