On Thu April 2 2009, Yves Rutschle wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:01:48AM -0500, Michael S. Zick wrote: > > I realize that progress in the security field is slow - but will this > > new release support rfc1149? > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1149 > > That's a hardware layer, below IP. SSL is well above that, > over TCP. If your operating system supports rfc1149, you > should be able to use OpenSSL on it transparently (there is > a patch for Linux here: http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/). >
Thanks for the link - I missed that one. > > That was published back in '90 - it should be well vetted by now. > > Vetted? Does that consist in vaccination of the transport > layer against the flu? > (???) I only noticed that myself after making the post. I am afraid you got me on that question. I was wondering if they have been able to clean up the audit trail. Maybe a special wrapper for the transport layer? Mike > Y. > > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List [email protected] > Automated List Manager [email protected] > > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
