Charlie wrote: > His algorithm has one part that doesn't seem right to me, but changing > it made things even worse. It seems weird that the "Final" function is > inside the main for loop. It seems like "final" should mean... final. > (ie: after the looping is done).
It's quite common that fixing one bug exposes others. The solution is to fix the other bugs, not to put the one bug back and wonder why it doesn't work *with* an obvious bug. DS ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
