On Fri June 3 2011, loody wrote: > hi: > > 2011/4/20 Mike Mohr <akih...@gmail.com>: > > IMHO openssl is unsuitable for this purpose. Openssl is really good > > at what it does, don't get me wrong, but using it in a boot loader > > probably isn't the easiest/smartest idea. What you really want is a > > subset of PKCS#1 - that is, EMSA-PSS encoding and verification plus > > RSASP1/RSAVP1. I'm working on some code which happens to implement > > exactly this feature set using GMP, and it could trivially be ported > > to some smaller bigint library. I release all my code under GPL3+, > > and you're welcome to use it as such - but it sounds like you're > > working on some tivoized system, which is incompatible with GPL3. > >
If your working on a boot loader for something like a media player device, you probably just want to use the SoC's built-in AES and SHA instructions directly. (another) Mike > > Mike > I found a link as below: > http://tree.celinuxforum.org/pipermail/celinux-dev/2006-August/001277.html > > I don't try it yet, and I'm quite curious whether it is possible for > combining openssl with standalone program? > Except license issue, openssl need a lot c lib help, right? > > Or it is possible if we only use RSA and SHA1 part of openssl? ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
