On Sun, Apr 15, 2012, Jeffrey Walton wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:01 PM,  <toredhiddenu...@tormail.net> wrote:
> > Hello guyz and cryptobrains! :P
> >
> > One of the main disadvantages of EC on openssl seems to be the inability
> > to create arbitrary-sized keys and advantage for RSA: you can create 32768
> > bit RSA key but... not greater than 521 bits on ECC.
> >
> > Will this continue to be a disadvantage or can 32768 RSA key be used 
> > instead?
> Point counting is tricky business. I believe it is the reason most
> folks (OpenSSL, Crypto++, NSS, etc) stick with well known curves.
> 
> I don't know how to plug in a custom curve with OpenSSL (I have never
> had a need to do it), but I do know how with Crypto++. If I wanted to
> do so, I would use Marcel Martin's Elliptic Curve Builder (ECB) to
> generate domain parameters to meet security levels.
> 

It should be possible to use a non-named curve with the appropriate encoding
of the ECParameters structure. I've never had to do this either.

Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to