OK. Misunderstood the earlier answer. Charles
-----Original Message----- From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Dave Thompson Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 12:26 AM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: RE: Building an "exportable" OpenSSL application > From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Charles Mills > Sent: Wednesday, 17 October, 2012 09:47 <snip> [Using ShiningLight Windows build] > > If you link with lib/VC/* (or lib/MinGW/*) you get implicit dynamic > > linking. If you link with > > lib/VC/static/* you get static linking. > > Thanks. Did not exactly understand that point. I am in fact using > lib/VC/*. > I may change that to MinGW so that the intention is more obvious. > I wouldn't advise that. The (two) VC directories are built for VC++ and the MinGW directory is built for MinGW. MinGW (unlike Cygwin) tries to be mostly pretty much compatible with VC++ but I wouldn't rely on it being totally so. Better to use as designed. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
