On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Jakob Bohm <jb-open...@wisemo.com> wrote: > On 12/31/2012 12:39 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> >> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 3:20 PM, <jb-open...@wisemo.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 30-12-2012 21:01, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >>>> >>>>... >> >> Configure should test `makeddepend`. If 'makedepend' succeeds, do >> nothing. If 'makedepend' fails, it should patch the resulting Makefile >> with "MAKEDEPEND=$(CC) -M' on Apple platforms. >> > Did you read my second post from last night (the one about me not trusting > the "$(CC) -M" option on OS/X?). Yes. The process is for OS X 10.6, 10.7, and 10.8. It is not for older versions of Apple tools chains as you indicated in the earlier response.
The worse case is: the replacement of 'makedpend` with `$(CC) -M` is lateral. That is, we traded one broken system for another broken system without requiring the user to do a thing. No user intervention is good (during the swap of the known missing 'makedepend'). If that fails, I will point folks to your suggestions (seriously). I have the link save locally and will provide them with, "Please see Jakob Bohm's post at ...". >> That's the behavior I am looking for. and the Makefile.org are >> available online for inspection. >> http://cvs.openssl.org/fileview?f=openssl/Configure&v=1.621.2.37.2.32.2.11 >> >> http://cvs.openssl.org/fileview?f=openssl/Makefile.org&v=1.295.2.10.2.11.2.3 >> > > I think this is better done by someone who is already familiar with that > piece of code ("./Configure") and its design/style. Agreed :) Jeff ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
