I guess the next time I see a linker complain about _<NAME> I'll know what's wrong :)
Thanks for the help On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Michel <msa...@paybox.com> wrote: > > Found interresting related article from Wikipedia : > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Name_mangling<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_mangling> > > "Note that the 64-bit convention on Windows (Microsoft C) is no leading > underscore. > This difference may in some rare cases lead to unresolved externals when > porting such code to 64 bits. " > > Le 11/01/2013 01:06, Dave Thompson a écrit : > > Winx86 has two generally used calling conventions, >> which are distinguished by different name mangling: >> cdecl has underscore at the beginning; >> stdcall has atsign-number (of bytes popped) at the end. >> (Plus several more that are used more locally.) >> >> (I've been told) Winx64 has only one calling convention >> and doesn't need this mangling, so maybe it isn't done >> or at least isn't done the same way. >> >> > ______________________________**______________________________**__________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org > Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org > -- -- Ribhi
