2014-09-08 3:52 GMT+02:00 Jakob Bohm <[email protected]>: > And how would you do that without breaking compatibility with every > program (in C, C++ or any other language) that already uses openssl and > depends on the current API names?
That's the show-stopper rationale. I expect that old projects relying on OpenSSL should be adapted at some time, otherwise OpenSSL may provide backward compatibility updates (as it does now). But at some point bugs must be fixed and, IMHO, the namespace/prefix pollution of OpenSSL is a bug. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
