On 03/16/2015 01:55 PM, jonetsu wrote: > Hello, > > The licenses, patents for ECC was noticed. In short, if we do not > care about this in the sense of not willing to be in any patent > infringement situation down the road, the -ecb archive should be > used, is that right ?
It's "ecp", not "ecb". But yes, the "ecp" version omits binary curve ECC for those concerned about those patents. > Also, there is a mention of a NSA-PLA.pdf > agreemnet statement. The file is not found. Is this still valid in > some ways ? Still valid: http://openssl.com/testing/validation-2.0/docs/NSA-PLA.pdf -Steve M. -- Steve Marquess OpenSSL Software Foundation, Inc. 1829 Mount Ephraim Road Adamstown, MD 21710 USA +1 877 673 6775 s/b +1 301 874 2571 direct marqu...@opensslfoundation.com marqu...@openssl.com gpg/pgp key: http://openssl.com/docs/0x6D1892F5.asc _______________________________________________ openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
