I agree but that's not the side I'm working on; the client is already widely
distributed and if we can identify that as the interop problem then I can make
an argument to the client team to upgrade but that doesn't solve the currently
deployed problem ... N
________________________________________
From: openssl-users [openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] on behalf of Viktor
Dukhovni [openssl-us...@dukhovni.org]
Sent: February 27, 2016 1:14 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] Failed TLSv1.2 handshake with
error 67702888--bad signature
> On Feb 27, 2016, at 3:49 PM, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 07:45:18PM +0000, Nounou Dadoun wrote:
>> PLATFORM=VC-WIN64A
>
> Can you try a build with no-asm?
Or perhaps with 1.0.1r, why stick with 1.0.1h???
--
Viktor.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
