Sorry, that may be the name of one of the associated libraries, in any event it's a Linaro arm toolchain version 4.9.1 running on a linux x-64 vm ... N
-----Original Message----- From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Nounou Dadoun Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 12:31 PM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] Failed TLSv1.2 handshake with error 67702888--bad signature It's arm-linux-gnueabihf-4.9.1 ... N Nou Dadoun Senior Firmware Developer, Security Specialist Office: 604.629.5182 ext 2632 -----Original Message----- From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Kurt Roeckx Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 12:23 PM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] Failed TLSv1.2 handshake with error 67702888--bad signature Which compiler and version are you using? Kurt On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:12:10PM +0000, Nounou Dadoun wrote: > For the record, I added no-asm to the config options and got exactly > the same result on the sha512t test. Open to other suggestions ... N > > > Nou Dadoun > Senior Firmware Developer, Security Specialist > > > Office: 604.629.5182 ext 2632 > > -----Original Message----- > From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On > Behalf Of Nounou Dadoun > Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:39 AM > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Subject: Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] Failed TLSv1.2 handshake > with error 67702888--bad signature > > Back in the office today - the sha1 and sha256 tests passed but the sha512 > failed immediately as below. > > # ./sha1test > test 1 ok > test 2 ok > test 3 ok > # ./sha256t > Testing SHA-256 ... passed. > Testing SHA-224 ... passed. > # ./sha512t > Testing SHA-512 > TEST 1 of 3 failed. > # > > Took a quick look at the code and it looks pretty straightforward, do you > have a version you'd like me to run that dumps the result over and above > doing a straight memcmp (funny that it doesn't do that anyway on failure) or > just let me know what you'd like dumped and what format you'd like it in. > And maybe remove the returns so it goes through all the tests? > > Happy to help root cause this issue if I can. > > Haven't tried the no-asm option yet, I might try that next. > > Nou Dadoun > Senior Firmware Developer, Security Specialist > > Office: 604.629.5182 ext 2632 > > -----Original Message----- > From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On > Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson > Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 4:58 AM > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Subject: Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] Failed TLSv1.2 handshake > with error 67702888--bad signature > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016, Nounou Dadoun wrote: > > > > > We're cross-compiling on a linux x86 vm, does "make test" produce something > > that I can run on the target? > > "make test" wont be very useful then. The binary test/sha512t you can copy to > the target and run it. I'd be interested in the output. > > Steve. > -- > Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. > Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
