> On Sep 12, 2016, at 1:07 PM, Nikolay Kudryavtsev
> <nikolay.kudryavt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The signature is base64 encoded, so first I do:
> openssl enc -d -A -base64 -in signature.txt -out signature.sha1
> Then I do:
> openssl dgst -verify pubkey.pem -signature signature.sha1 datafile.txt
> Or:
> openssl dgst -sha1 -verify pubkey.pem -signature signature.sha1 datafile.txt
> Either of those fails with:
> Verification Failure
>
> Whenever I try to verify data signed with my own key, everything works. But
> for that data that I got from a third party nothing works. That third party
> is adamant that the signature is correct and it's RSA_SHA1, but they've been
> unwilling to explain the details on how they sign it and what they use to
> verify.
What is the canonical representation of the text file?
Does it have <LF> line-endings, or <CRLF> line endings?
In what representation was it signed?
--
Viktor.
--
Viktor.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
