> On Jun 1, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Wouter Verhelst <wouter.verhe...@fedict.be>
> wrote:
>
> It might be useful to make that point at the start of the CHANGES file,
> then. Currently, it just says "Changes between X.Y.Zx and X.Y.Zy
> [date]". While that doesn't claim to be complete, the simple word
> "CHANGES" invokes the idea of a changelog, which should be complete --
> and this file is not. If it's not meant to be, fine -- but then it
> doesn't hurt to say so, and it would alleviate some confusion.
Sure, would "Major changes" be sufficient? This is essentially
a RELEASE_NOTES file, not a comprehensive change log, which is
subsumed by git.
--
Viktor.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
