On 31-10-17 17:26, Matt Caswell wrote: > I agree its not a great name for it. Unfortunately we are stuck with it > for compatibility reasons. If we renamed it we would break any code that > is currently using it. We could introduce a new flag with a different > name which does the same thing - but I'm not sure that does anything to > make things less confusing.
You could always keep the old name around and mark it deprecated. GCC even has a pragma for that -- __attribute__((deprecated)) -- although I doubt it works on macros (haven't tested that). I suppose it might be too much of an effort for too little gain, though. -- Wouter Verhelst -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
