On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <openssl-us...@dukhovni.org > wrote:
> > > > On Dec 22, 2017, at 11:33 PM, J Decker <d3c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Very similar to OpenSSL 1.0.2, plus its own extensions. That's not > exactly > > "same". > > > > The same in that I can link/compile against either and not change any > application code... not speaking of internals, just the API. > > Well, that's not actually true. There are API differences. There > is a large common intersection that covers many legacy applications, > but newer features in each library are not present in the other. > Any many current applications. This app was all done with recent docs on recent version and I found 0 incompabilities. I did run into a beta feature for 1.1.0 that was something about setting the fragment size... https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable/issues/214 but again that wasn't in 1.0 stable openssl either so... > > -- > -- > Viktor. > > -- > openssl-users mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users >
-- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users