Another good question. I believe from the information I have been provided that 0.9.8za fixes the issues previously described for 0.9.8h, on SLES 11 SP1 (apparently). (Unless I am missing something here - highly possible?)
Dean Warren -----Original Message----- From: openssl-users <openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org> On Behalf Of Michael Wojcik Sent: 16 July 2018 15:27 To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Deployment > From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On > Behalf Of Dean Warren > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 03:32 > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Deployment > > Yeah that does sounds scary. > I will look into vendors options. Also - why 0.9.8za? That's *ancient*. This seems like a lot of work for a result of rather dubious value. What problem are you trying to solve? -- Michael Wojcik Distinguished Engineer, Micro Focus -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users SCISYS UK Limited. Registered in England and Wales No. 4373530. Registered Office: Methuen Park, Chippenham, Wiltshire SN14 0GB, UK. Before printing, please think about the environment. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
