On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 9:27 PM Richard Levitte <levi...@openssl.org> wrote: > Yes, running from the DESTDIR "installation" gets you into trouble. > DESTDIR is intended to be a staging directory, i.e. a place to put
Fair enough, I don't have to use DESTDIR, I configure with openssldir and prefix set to a sandbox now. We statically link openssl to get a self-contained binary. I'm not sure if --no-shared was sufficient to "build in" the legacy algs. Provider load failed, reasonably expectedly, but whether our test suite is failing because of missing legacy won't be clear to me until more of the superficial failures are fixed. Is there a reason two terms, "modules" and "providers", are both used? Are there modules that are NOT providers? It is confusing to use different names to describe the same thing, so if modules are providers, perhaps one name could be used consistently.
