On Wed, Jun 19 2013, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi,
[…] > This also encourages people to set a target milestone, which is pretty > essential in communicating out when a given feature is likely to land. Which have been the most common problem Ceilometer had for the Havana serie. People don't set milestones. > So this simplifies a lot, but we lose /some/ granularity: > > * You won't have blueprints on your roadmap that are not targeted to a > specific milestone, so it's more difficult to do a list of "would be > great to have in this release if only someone wanted to take them" > blueprints. We tried that, but that didn't work. Nobody took the blueprints. :-) > Thoughts ? That sounds like a good simplification, I'm all for it. -- Julien Danjou // Free Software hacker / freelance consultant // http://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
