"Sascha Peilicke" <speili...@suse.com> wrote: > On 07/04/2013 04:06 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > On 07/04/2013 06:10 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 04 2013, Julie Pichon wrote: > >>> Why is Selenium considered non-free? The code is Apache-licensed, > >>> including the Python bindings. > >>> > >>> FWIW only a few of the unit tests use Selenium (and those that do, need > >>> to), > >>> and they're not run by default unless you set a flag to do so. > >> > >> Yes, that seems like a mistake from the Debian packager as far as I can > >> tell. There's nothing that requires it to be in non-free. > >> > >> (Cc'ing Sascha, the maintainer) > > > > Well, see this: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636677 > > > > There are files not built from source. Also, when looking at the > > package, it seems that it isn't maintained as good as it deserves. > > #700061 was opened in 08 Feb 2013, and there's no answer at all from > > Sascha to this bug (which is RC). > > I am sorry, but I'm an openSUSE guy. But I can tell you we had similar > bugs :-)
I think Thomas was talking about Sascha Girrulat, the maintainer for the Debian package. > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755619 It looks like "I am not authorised to access this bug", thanks for the link though. I understand the idea :) Julie _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev