On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Mark McLoughlin <mar...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:18 +0400, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > > Mark, John, Nikola, > > > > > > Current in oslo we would like to put only 2 functions: > > > > 1) generic method for creating shadow table > > 2) generic method that the columns are same in shadow and main table > > > > > > So migration that adds shadow table could be done after all other > > works, when we finish improving of db-archiving utils (that moves > > deleted rows to shadow tables), to avoid problems that noticed > > Nikola. > > > > > > These 2 functions won't be affected and will be used in future in > > cinder, glance and they are already used in Nova. So I don't see any > > problem to push it into oslo at this moment. > > It's not clear to me that Cinder or Glance are planning to use these in > the Havana cycle. > > From afar, they both sound like they are part of the current Nova DB > archiving strategy that we're saying needs improvement before it is > adopted by other projects. > That seems pretty accurate regarding my viewpoint. > > Cheers, > Mark. > > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
