Dolph Mathews wrote: > On Monday, July 15, 2013, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> I'd generally agree with that. The only issue with devstack is that >> under the old project-based taxonomy it was classified as a "gating" >> project and therefore granted ATC status to its contributors. Under the >> new program-based taxonomy, if it's not adopted by a program then it >> would fall off the "official" ATC scope. > > How many people contribute to devstack that don't also contribute to > some other ATC-granting project?
Hopefully none :) But it's not just a question of falling off the ATC-granting scope... it's also that devstack is a critical piece of our CI system and I'd therefore prefer if it was taken care of by a team (or set of teams) under the Technical Committee authority. It used to be a project separate from "OpenStack" but we brought it to the fold for that precise reason. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
