On 08/07/2013 10:34 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: >>> That said - if we did service-ify the tool, wouldn't glance be a more >>> appropriate place for that sort of thing? >> >> Possibly, though the proof of concept (and we hope our proposed >> nova-based re-implementation) can build both glance images and cinder >> volume backed images. > > I like this idea (glance seeming to make more sense conceptually). > > It seems like the main sticking point is whether or not it can be made > to work for all (or most) hypervisors from outside of nova. Can we dig > into this point a bit deeper?
I forgot to mention here that I think targeting glance only as the destination is fine. You can create cinder volumes from glance images easily. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
