Dolph Mathews wrote: > With regard > to: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/key-distribution-server > [...]
Dolph: you don't mention Barbican at all, does that mean that the issue is settled and the KDS should live in keystone ? A side-benefit of landing early in Icehouse rather than late in Havana, IMHO, was that we could put everyone in the same room (and around the same beers) and get a single path forward. I'm a bit worried (that's with my release management hat on) that if everyone discovers that Barbican is the way to go for key distribution at the Hong-Kong summit, we would now have to deprecate the in-Keystone KDS over several releases just because it landed a few weeks too early. That said I haven't followed closely the latest discussions on this, so maybe this is not as much duplication of effort as I think ? -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
