Mark, good thoughts (as usual) On 08/19/2013 09:15 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote: > The goal isn't really to replace sqlalchemy completely.
Perhaps my problem is that I am not exactly sure what the goals are. Cleanup (BL mixed in the BL seems wrong)? HA or performance (are people hitting limits that are traced to SQL) ? Flexibility/Research (plug-able modules for experimentation)? I think it would help scope the effort (and temper my concern about the work/reward ratio) if they were enumerated in clear place. > I'm hoping I can > create a space where multiple drivers can operate efficiently without > introducing bugs (i.e. pull all that business logic out of the driver!) > I'll be very interested to see if people can, after such a refactoring, > try out some more storage approaches, such as dropping the sqlalchemy > orm in favor of its generic engine support or direct sql execution, as > well as NoSQL what-have-you. We don't have to make all of the drivers > live in the project, so it really can be a good place for interested > parties to experiment. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev