On 09/03/2013 05:41 PM, Coffman, Joel M. wrote: >> How can someone use your code without a key manager? > > Some key management mechanism is required although it could be > simplistic. For example, we’ve tested our code internally with an > implementation of the key manager interface that returns a single, > constant key.
I understand Joe's concern. I've used a similar argument to turn down other features. I generally want *everything* we merge to be usable with the code in the tree. If it's not usable, I push to have it wait until it is. In this case, it's obviously something we should have caught and brought up earlier. If there is any possible way a simple implementation of the key manager interface could be included, then that could probably save this for Havana. We could consider a feature freeze exception to give it a few extra days, but not more than that. Otherwise, as much as I really hate to say it, this will probably have to get deferred. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
