Thanks, I'm done here.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49316/ - Ozawa > Ozawa, +1 to what Zhi said. Go ahead and submit a patch for review and we can > consider it for Icehouse. Also try to attend the glance meeting if possible > and we can discuss it there. > > Having better uploads/downloads and specifically better error handling for > uploads and downloads would definitely help conserve resources and improve > time taken. > > Iccha > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Zhi Yan Liu" <lzy....@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 1:29am > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposed S3 multi-part upload > functionality > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Masashi Ozawa <moz...@cloudian.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > We already created the blueprint for this feature below belore, if > > Glance can use S3 MultiPart Upload REST API for the large objects in > > future release as Amazon recommends it for the large object to be > > uploaded, I believe that it's very useful for the customers and a good > > thing for AWS and other S3 servers. > > > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/s3-multi-part-upload > > > > However it's not in the future release list so we actually implemeted > > this feature based on Grizzly for an internal testing porpose and it > > works so far. > > > > Made the implementation strategy below. So please review this so that > > we can hopefully have this feature in the future openstack release. > > > > - Proposal S3 multi-part upload functionality > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/s3-multi-part-upload > > > > thanks, > > - Ozawa > > -- > > Cloudian KK - http://cloudian.jp/ > > Masashi Ozawa <moz...@cloudian.com> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > Hello Masashi Ozawa, > > I consider it's a worth enhancement for s3 store driver, with a minor > change and a boto requirement update. You can just prepare your patch > base on the trunk code and commit it to Gerrit to allow team take a > review If you like. > Actually I'm just thinking if a resume-broken-transfer (image > uploading and downloading) is a useful thing for Glance as a common > requirement/enhancement. Any thoughts from you(s)? > > thanks, > zhiyan > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev