Russell Bryant wrote: > At the last Nova meeting we started talking about some updates to the > Nova blueprint process for the Icehouse cycle. I had hoped we could > talk about and finalize this in a Nova design summit session on "Nova > Project Structure and Process" [1], but I think we need to push forward > on finalizing this as soon as possible so that it doesn't block current > work being done. > > Here is a first cut at the process. Let me know what you think is > missing or should change. I'll get the result of this thread posted on > the wiki. > [...]
+1 That's pretty much how I would like every project to handle their blueprints. For smaller projects I guess the "2 core signed up for >=Medium blueprints" requirement can be handled informally, but the rest is spot-on and should be applicable everywhere. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev