Kyle, I'm afraid your meeting vanished from the Meetings page [2] when user amotiki reworked neutron meetings ^.^ Is the meeting for Thu 1600 UTC still on?
A few heads-up questions (couldn't attend the HK design summit Friday meeting): 1) In the summit session Etherpad [3], ML2 implementation mentions insertion of arbitrary metadata to hint to underlying implementation. Is that (a) the plug-ing reporting its policy-bound realization? (b) the user further specifying what should be used? (c) both? Or (d) none of that but just some arbitrary message of the day? 2) Would policies _always_ map to the old Neutron entities? E.g. when I have policies in place, can I query related network/port, subnet/address, router elements on the API or are there no equivalents created? Would the logical topology created under the policies be exposed otherwise? for e.g. monitoring/wysiwyg/troubleshoot purposes. 3) Do the chain identifier in your policy rule actions match to "Service Chain UUID" in Service Insertion, Chaining and API [4] 4) Are you going to describe L2 services the way group policies work? I mean, why would I need a LoadBalancer or Firewall instance before I can insert it between two groups when all that load balancing/firewalling requires is nothing but a policy for group communication itself? - regardless the service instance used to carry out the service. Best, Manuel [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Neutron_Group_Policy_Sub-Team_Meeting [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Group_Based_Policy_Abstraction_for_Neutron [4] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fmCWpCxAN4g5txmCJVmBDt02GYew2kvyRsh0Wl3YF2U/edit# > -----Original Message----- > From: Kyle Mestery (kmestery) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Montag, 11. November 2013 19:41 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Group-based Policy > Sub-team Meetings > > Hi folks! Hope everyone had a safe trip back from Hong Kong. > Friday afternoon in the Neutron sessions we discussed the > "Group-based Policy Abstraction" BP [1]. It was decided we > would try to have a weekly IRC meeting to drive out further > requirements with the hope of coming up with a list of > actionable tasks to begin working on by December. > I've tentatively set the meeting [2] for Thursdays at 1600 > UTC on the #openstack-meeting-alt IRC channel. If there are > serious conflicts with this day and time, please speak up > soon. Otherwise, we'll host our first meeting on Thursday this week. > > Thanks! > Kyle > > [1] > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/group-based-pol icy-abstraction > [2] > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Neutron_Group_Policy_ > Sub-Team_Meeting > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
