fyi. gate-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron-large-ops is now a bit more stable (compare [1] and [2]) with the Nova change [3]. Joe earlier posted a call to arms [4] yesterday.
[1] http://logstash.openstack.org/#eyJzZWFyY2giOiJcIkZpbmlzaGVkOiBGQUlMVVJFXCIgQU5EIGJ1aWxkX25hbWU6XCJnYXRlLXRlbXBlc3QtZGV2c3RhY2stdm0tbmV1dHJvbi1sYXJnZS1vcHNcIiAiLCJmaWVsZHMiOltdLCJvZmZzZXQiOjAsInRpbWVmcmFtZSI6IjYwNDgwMCIsImdyYXBobW9kZSI6ImNvdW50IiwidGltZSI6eyJ1c2VyX2ludGVydmFsIjowfSwic3RhbXAiOjEzODQ1NDM3NDgzODcsIm1vZGUiOiIiLCJhbmFseXplX2ZpZWxkIjoiIn0= [2] http://logstash.openstack.org/#eyJzZWFyY2giOiJcIkZpbmlzaGVkOiBTVUNDRVNTXCIgQU5EIGJ1aWxkX25hbWU6XCJnYXRlLXRlbXBlc3QtZGV2c3RhY2stdm0tbmV1dHJvbi1sYXJnZS1vcHNcIiIsImZpZWxkcyI6W10sIm9mZnNldCI6MCwidGltZWZyYW1lIjoiNjA0ODAwIiwiZ3JhcGhtb2RlIjoiY291bnQiLCJ0aW1lIjp7InVzZXJfaW50ZXJ2YWwiOjB9LCJzdGFtcCI6MTM4NDU0MzgxOTg1MCwibW9kZSI6IiIsImFuYWx5emVfZmllbGQiOiIifQ== [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56075/ [4] http://markmail.org/message/lelobpwkle34sh4a On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/15/2013 01:26 PM, Lorin Hochstein wrote: >> Was the fate of nova-network discussed at the icehouse summit? > > Yes. [1][2] > >> In particular, has there been a decision made about whether it will >> definitely be deprecated in some (as yet unspecified) future release, or >> whether it will continue to be supported for the foreseeable future? > > We want to deprecate it. There are some things blocking moving forward > with this. In short: > > 1) Feature parity (primarily something that satisfies performance and HA > requirements addressed by nova-network in multi-host mode) > > 2) Testing and quality parity. The status of Neutron testing in the > gate is far inferior to the testing done against nova-network. > > I'm personally more worried about #2 than #1 at this point. > > A major issue is that very few people actually stepped up and agreed to > help with #2 at the summit [2]. Only one person signed up to work on > tempest issues. Nobody signed up to help with grenade. If this doesn't > happen, nova-network can't be deprecated, IMO. > > If significant progress isn't made ASAP this cycle, and ideally by > mid-cycle so we can change directions if necessary, then we'll have to > discuss what next step to take. That may include un-freezing > nova-network so that various people holding on to enhancements to > nova-network can start submitting them back. It's a last resort, but I > consider it on the table. > > [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-neutron-nova-parity > [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-summit-qa-neutron > > -- > Russell Bryant > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev