I was off earlier this week (and unfortunately couldn't attend the weekly meeting) but from the sound of it a very different conclusion has been reached within the TripleO community. Apparently, this was understood to mean that we *could not* keep our existing logo. And that is sad thing to do "just because" someone wants to have a common theme.
So I say lets keep it. And continue using it as is... At least that is the way it is in some communities: https://www.kernel.org/ And yes. They have stylized old tux as well... but at least they kept the original too. Dan On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 21:12 +0000, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-02-15 15:52:30 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: > > The fact that the foundation is involved in "streamlining" team > > logos > > just kind of makes me a bit sad I guess. I mean, what value is this > > really adding to the OpenStack projects? > > > > Devs on many projects spend their own time on creating logos... > > that > > they like. I say let them be happy and have their own logos. No > > harm > > here I think. Move along and let us focus on the important things. > > [...] > > There's definitely nothing stopping various teams from using other > logos if they want. The OpenStack Foundation doesn't govern the > project, they merely want to have a consistent set of logos _they_ > can use on their own site when providing aggregate information about > multiple teams and were hoping that they could gather enough > feedback to be able to put together something that those teams would > also be interested in reusing. It's in no way mandatory or exclusive > of other art you may already have and feel a connection with. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
