On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:46:09PM -0500, Artom Lifshitz wrote: > > But before doing that though, I think it'd be worth understanding whether > > metadata-over-vsock support would be acceptable to people who refuse > > to deploy metadata-over-TCPIP today. > > Sure, although I'm still concerned that it'll effectively make tagged > hotplug libvirt-only.
Well there's still the option of accessing the metadata server the traditional way over IP which is fully portable. If some deployments choose to opt-out of this facility I don't neccessarily think we need to continue to invent further mechanisms. At some point you have to say what's there is good enough and if people choose to trade off features against some other criteria so be it. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
