Steven Hardy wrote: > I agree - those nominated by Zane are all highly experienced reviewers and > as ex-PTLs are well aware of the constraints around stable backports and > stable release management. > > I do agree the requirements around reviews for stable branches are very > different, but I think we need to assume good faith here and accept we have > a bottleneck which can be best fixed by adding some folks we *know* are > capable of exercising sound judgement to the stable-maint team for heat. > > I respect the arguments made by the stable-maint core folks, and I think we > all understand the reason for these concerns, but ultimately unless folks > outside the heat core team are offering to help with reviews directly, I > think it's a little unreasonable to block the addition of these reviewers, > given they've been proposed by the current stable liason who I think is in > the best position to judge the suitability of candidates.
That sounds reasonable to me. I think you should be able to get it settled with tonyb over beer sometimes this week :) -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
