On Mon, Mar 6, 2017, at 08:42 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 03/06/2017 06:27 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
> > On 15:55 Mar 02, Morales, Victor wrote:
> >> I got this link[11] from Ankur, apparently Nova and Neutron has already 
> >> started a common effort
> >>
> >> [11] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/330027/
> >
> > Thanks for pointing me to this Victor! I have spoke to Doug and Sean Dague 
> > in
> > #openstack-dev about this, and I think it'll be fine for us to keep the 
> > current
> > INI file approach. I've reached out to Ankur to hopefully restore and 
> > continue
> > this effort.
> >
> > What do Designate and Cinder folks think of this approach?
> 
> The only thing I'd suggest is not to wrap it into oslosphinx but just do 
> it as a dedicated extension. When we did os-api-ref we eventually had to 
> jump themes because this was going to end up outside the devref in 
> projects, and being decoupled made that possible.

+1 -- we have lots of experience releasing libraries, and the "theme"
component in oslosphinx is likely to go away as soon as the docs team
publishes a compatible version of their theme library.

Doug

> 
>       -Sean
> 
> -- 
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to