Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Brant Knudson's message of 2017-03-15 10:27:49 -0500: >> Can the Castellan team be broken out into a new project under the big tent >> rather than having to go under oslo? Oslo as a catch-all made more sense >> before the big tent. Also, I always thought part of the deal of moving >> under oslo is that oslo core reviewers have +2 authority on the repos, but >> it doesn't look like that's part of the proposal here which was a rename >> and now is changing launchpad to make Castellan a subproject under oslo >> (along with some documentation changes). >> >> - Brant > > I assumed that bringing it into Oslo would involve adding the oslo-core > team to whatever review team Castellan already has.
Yes, of course. To me the main reason to bring it under Oslo is to make it a neutral abstraction library, and position it as "the common OpenStack way to do key management". Oslo is the umbrella for common libraries in OpenStack. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
