On 16:37 Mar 18, Mike Perez wrote: > On 16:02 Mar 15, Monty Taylor wrote: > > On 03/15/2017 02:52 PM, Louis Taylor wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> wrote: > > >> On Wed, Mar 15 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > >> > > >>> Yep, jd__ and i confirmed that things work with 3.x > > >> > > >> Though to be clear, what's used in tooz is the v2 HTTP API, not the new > > >> v3 gRPC API. > > > > > > And just to be double clear: although etcd 3.x comes with a v2 api, > > > the etcd3 api also has a different data model, so the data stored > > > using it is not accessible to the v2 api, and vice versa. > > > > AH! That's different... > > > > For my money, not that I have any, I'd still suggest we just pile on > > getting moved over to v3 gRPC real quick and then make that the default. > > I'm also happy about this move. However, it doesn't matter if we made this > decision 1.5 years ago. What matters is we this decision in a place that > others > were around to contribute to the decision, which was the summit. The Forum is > coming up, so I have proposed the topic. Coming to a decision of changing the > default or even a base service for our operators over the dev list is not > a good idea.
Thinking about this some more, I guess changing the default in gate won't matter as long as some implementation of tooz is being used. My mind is fuzzy whether or not we explicity decided to gate on zookeeper, or if what Monty says is right that it was the only thing working so we did that. Removed my -1. -- Mike Perez
pgprG61VgrOgM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
