On 03/23/2017 04:20 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > Hey folks, > > So after looking at the backlog of patches to review across all of the > tripleo projects, I noticed we have a bunch of really old stale > patches. I think it's time we address when we can abandon these stale > patches. > > Please comment on the proposed policy[0]. I know this has previously > been brought up [1] but I would like to formalize the policy so we can > reduce the backlog of stale patches. If you're wondering what would > be abandoned by this policy as it currently sits, I have a gerrit > dashboard for you[2] (it excludes diskimage-builder) . > > Thanks, > -Alex > > [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449332/ > [1] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-October/076666.html > [2] https://goo.gl/XC9Hy7 > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev I have no comments. It looks good from the TripleO-UI perspective.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
