On 4/3/2017 11:27 AM, Walter Boring wrote:
Actually, this is incorrect.

The sticking point of this all was doing the coordination and initiation of workflow from Nova. Cinder already has the ability to call the driver to do the resize of the volume. Cinder just prevents this now, because there is work that has to be done on the attached side to make the new size actually show up.

What needs to happen is:
A new Nova API needs to be created to initiate and coordinate this effort. The API would call Cinder to extend the size, then get the connection information from Cinder for that volume, then call os-brick to extend the size, then update the domain xml to tell libvirt to extend the size. The end user inside the VM would have to issue the same SCSI bus rescan and refresh that happens inside of os-brick, to make the kernel and filesystem in the VM recognize the new size.

os-brick does all of the heavy lifting already on the host side of things.
The Connector API entry point:
https://github.com/openstack/os-brick/blob/master/os_brick/initiator/initiator_connector.py#L153

iSCSI example:
https://github.com/openstack/os-brick/blob/master/os_brick/initiator/connectors/iscsi.py#L370

os-brick's code works for single path and multipath attached volumes. multipath has a bunch of added complexity with resize that should already be taken care of here:
https://github.com/openstack/os-brick/blob/master/os_brick/initiator/linuxscsi.py#L375


Walt

On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Jay Bryant <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Matt,

    I think discussion on this goes all the way back to Tokyo. There
    was work on the Cinder side to send the notification to Nova which
    I believe all the pieces were in place for. The missing part
    (sticking point) was doing a rescan of the SCSI bus in the node
    that had the extended volume attached.

    Has doing that been solved since Tokyo?

    Jay


    On 4/1/2017 10:34 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:

        On 3/31/2017 8:55 PM, TommyLike Hu wrote:

            There was a time when this feature had been both proposed
            in Cinder [1]
            and Nova [2], but unfortunately no one (correct me if I am
            wrong) is
            going to handle this feature during Pike. We do think
            extending an
            online volume is a beneficial and mostly supported by
            venders feature.
            We really don't want this feature missed from OpenStack
            and would like
            to continue on. So anyone could share your knowledge of
            how many works
            are left till now and  where should I start with?

            Thanks
            TommyLike.Hu

            [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272524/
            <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272524/>
            [2]
            
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-support-attached-volume-extend
            
<https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-support-attached-volume-extend>



            
__________________________________________________________________________

            OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
            Unsubscribe:
            [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
            
<http://[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe>
            http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
            <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>


        The nova blueprint description does not contain much for
        details, but from what is there it sounds a lot of like the
        existing volume swap operation which is triggered from Cinder
        by a volume migration or retype operation. How do those
        existing operations not already solve this use case?



    __________________________________________________________________________
    OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
    Unsubscribe:
    [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
    <http://[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe>
    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
    <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>




__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Walt,

Sorry for getting the info wrong. Thank you for getting the right details out there!

Jay
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to