+1, yay! :-)

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com>
wrote:

> Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-04-12 08:14:31 -0500:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > As I'm sure you all know, pbr is both our most pervasively used
> > dependency and our least well understood. Nobody ever wants to look at
> > the code (sorry, I can write ugly code sometimes - but also wow
> > setuptools) or dig in to figure out what happened when things break.
> >
> > Recently Stephen Finucane (sfinucan) has stepped up to the plate to help
> > sort out issues we've been having. He's shown a lack of fear of the
> > codebase and an understanding of what's going on. He's also following
> > through on patches to projects themselves when needed, which is a huge
> > part of the game. And most importantly he knows when to suggest we _not_
> > do something.
> >
> > It's not a HUGE corpus of work we have to go on - but that's a good
> > thing - pbr shouldn't chance much - but it's in keeping with the other
> > active pbr maintainers:
> >
> > http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/pbr/90
> >
> > Monty
> >
>
> +1 -- Stephen has been doing good work elsewhere, too.
>
> Doug
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to