Jarret Raim wrote: >> >> The TC is currently working on formalizing requirements for new programs >> and projects [3]. I figured I would give them a try against this >> application. >> >> First, I'm assuming that the application is for a new program that >> contains the new project. The application doesn't make that bit clear, >> though. > > In looking through the documentation for incubating [1], there doesn¹t > seem to be any mention of also having to be associated with a program. Is > it a requirement that all projects belong to a program at this point? If > so, I guess we would be asking for a new program as I think that > encryption and key management is a separate concern from the rest of the > programs listed here [2]. > > [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewProjects > [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Programs
With the introduction of programs (think: official teams), all incubated/integrated projects must belong to an official program... So when a project applies for incubation but is not part of an official program yet, it de-facto also applies to be considered a program. > [...] >>> ** Team should have a lead, elected by the team contributors >> >> Was the PTL elected? I can't seem to find record of that. If not, I >> would like to see an election held for the PTL. > > We¹re happy to do an election. Is this something we can do as part of the > next election cycle? Or something that needs to be done out of band? I'm not 100% sure we'll keep that "election" requirement. I think the program application should have an initial PTL named on it. The way that's determined is up to the team (natural candidate, election...). >>> ** Team should have a clear way to grant ATC (voting) status to its >>> significant contributors >> >> Related to the above > > I thought that the process of becoming an ATC was pretty well set [3]. Is > there some specific that Barbican would have to do that is different than > the ATC rules in the Tech Committee documentation? > > [3] > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/TechnicalCommittee No, since the team produces code the ATC designation method is pretty well established. This rule cares for programs which have weirder deliverables. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
